Textured implants
In 2018 it was revealed that textured implants (with a rough surface) were at risk for ALCL (cancer of the immune system)
That is why a large part of these implants was taken off the market in 2019 and they did not receive a new CE mark:
McGhan BioDimensional Silicone-Filled Biocell Textured Breast Implants
McGhan Magna-Site Tissue Expander
McGhan Style 134 Croissant Shaped Tissue Expander
Natrelle 133 Plus Issue Expanders
Natrelle 133 Tissue Expanders with and without suture tabs
Natrelle 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled Breast Implants
Natrelle Inspira Silicone-Filled Breast Implants
Natrelle Saline Breast Implants
Natrelle Silicone-Filled Breast Implants
Style 133 Biospan Tissue Expander
Scientific research
Risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in a cohort of 3546 women prospectively followed long term after reconstruction with textured breast implants 2020 >>
Soft Textured Implants: Roughness, Friction, and the Complications 2020 >>
In vivo damage study of different textured breast implants 2020 >>
Capsular contracture around silicone miniimplants following bacterial contamination: an in vivo comparative experimental study between textured and polyurethane implants 2020 >>
Risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in a cohort of 3546 women prospectively followed long term after reconstruction with textured breast implants 2020 >>
Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response 2018 >>
Physico-chemical characteristics of coated silicone textured versus smooth breast implants differentially influence breast-derived fibroblast morphology and behaviour 2014 >>
Type IV hypersensitivity to a textured silicone breast implant 2012 >>